ell, as others said elsewhere, that was anticlimactic. Dan Savage posted his “pro-poly-identity” column, following on his letter of last week in which he baldly stated that polyamory is not an identity. Sadly, what he posted in his actual column was pretty paltry, amounting to a couple of tweets. There are some decent comments buried in the comments section again, though.
So if you want more discussion on this issue, you might want to check out:
Anita Wagner Illig’s Practical Polyamory blog (she also posted this in the comments to Dan’s thread)
I’ve got more to say on the topic of identity, but not tonight. 🙂
Here’s hoping you are happy with both what you do AND who you are, whatever those are!
PS: Got Jealousy? Schedule a 1/2 hour free consultation with me, and get my Jealousy Judo pdf of tools to use to manage jealousy in yourself. Because jealousy is no fun!
∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥ ∞ ♥
[© 2012 Dawn M. Davidson]